Aster vs Aevo

Detailed side-by-side comparison of features, fees, and trading experience

Aster

+ Industry-leading up to 1001x leverage in Simple Mode on select crypto pairs (BTC, ETH on BNB Chain and Arbitrum)
+ MEV-resistant hidden orders enable whale-size trades without front-running or price impact — unique among major perp DEXes
+ Yield-bearing collateral (asBNB, USDF) allows traders to earn yield while maintaining open margin positions

− Maximum leverage of 1001x in Simple Mode is extremely risky — a 0.1% adverse move liquidates a 1001x position
− Restricted in the US, UK, and Canada — three of the largest crypto markets — with no confirmed timeline for expansion
− Founded team is pseudonymous with limited public disclosure of the full private cap table and upgrade key management

+ Unique options markets alongside perpetuals — one of the only DEX platforms offering onchain vanilla options alongside 148+ perpetual pairs
+ Competitive perpetuals fees at 0.08% taker / 0.05% maker, with maker rebates on options as low as 0.03%
+ No KYC required — fully non-custodial trading by connecting any EVM wallet, accessible globally except US, Canada, and China

− Maximum leverage of 20x is lower than competitors like Hyperliquid (40x) and GMX (50x) — not suitable for high-leverage seekers
− TVL of approximately $22M is significantly lower than leading perpetuals DEXs (Hyperliquid: $4.8B, GMX: $500M+) — may limit depth and liquidity
− Only USDC accepted as primary collateral — no multi-collateral support like some competing platforms

Is Aster or Aevo better?

Both exchanges are rated 4.2. Aster offers lower fees (0.0004% vs 0.08%). Choose Aster for lower fees, and Aevo for its features.

What are the fees on Aster vs Aevo?

Aster charges 0.0004% taker / 0.00005% maker. Aevo charges 0.08% taker / 0.05% maker for perpetuals.