Paradex vs Aevo

Detailed side-by-side comparison of features, fees, and trading experience

Paradex

+ Zero trading fees for retail users — both maker and taker — on 100+ perpetual futures markets, with pro taker fees at just 0.02%
+ Privacy-preserving trading via zk-encryption hides positions, entries, exits, and PnL from public view, preventing MEV and liquidation sniping
+ 600+ markets spanning perpetual futures, perpetual options, and spot — roughly triple the next competitor's roster

− USDC-only collateral — no multi-collateral support, limiting flexibility for traders holding other assets
− Restricted for US persons, Canadian persons, and sanctioned jurisdictions — VPN usage explicitly prohibited in Terms of Service
− Minimum order size of $500 on BTC, ETH, and SOL perpetuals ($200 on other markets), higher than many competitors

+ Unique options markets alongside perpetuals — one of the only DEX platforms offering onchain vanilla options alongside 148+ perpetual pairs
+ Competitive perpetuals fees at 0.08% taker / 0.05% maker, with maker rebates on options as low as 0.03%
+ No KYC required — fully non-custodial trading by connecting any EVM wallet, accessible globally except US, Canada, and China

− Maximum leverage of 20x is lower than competitors like Hyperliquid (40x) and GMX (50x) — not suitable for high-leverage seekers
− TVL of approximately $22M is significantly lower than leading perpetuals DEXs (Hyperliquid: $4.8B, GMX: $500M+) — may limit depth and liquidity
− Only USDC accepted as primary collateral — no multi-collateral support like some competing platforms

Is Paradex or Aevo better?

Paradex has a higher rating (4.5 vs 4.2). Paradex offers lower fees (0% vs 0.08%). Choose Paradex for lower fees, and Aevo for its features.

What are the fees on Paradex vs Aevo?

Paradex charges 0% taker / 0% maker. Aevo charges 0.08% taker / 0.05% maker for perpetuals.